Throughout the last few
decades, how has the metropolitan city of Los Angeles changed in means of
housing policies and inequality offered to Latinos from the 1930’s pre-
emancipation period to the 1960’s post Chicano movement? This is a deep
somewhat hard question to clearly answer. Some will look at this and realize
that there have been many beneficial changes to the Latino community and are
satisfied with the outcome. Whereas other will dwell on the fact that
throughout Los Angeles there are still factors of oppression and inequality. In
this blogpost I am suggesting that Latino immigrants have come a long way as
far as equality and reasonable housing policies throughout the city of Los
Angeles. After decades of oppression and several failed attempts, Latino
immigrants have gained their own voice in society.
As Mexican
and other Latino immigrants became incorporated into Los Angeles, they took
with them some aspects of their Latino culture. As a result, this clash in
metropolitan culture, left Latino immigrants feeling and seen as an outgroup.
This gave reasoning behind some of the racism that continued. For example, in
Los Angles 1942, a week long riot broke out known as the Zoo Suit Riot, which
steamed from racism towards young Mexicans. A zoot suit was known as a popular
outfit worn by young African American and Mexican American men in the 1940s.
There was a fight that broke out in central Los Angeles between a group of
zoot-suite wearing teenagers and sailors on leave. This fight lead to
continuous tensions between the two groups and quickly escalated into a brawl
were some sailors began roaming the streets of Los Angeles, beating any Mexican
American men and boys they could find.[1] The continuation of high tensions between
Latino immigrants and citizens of Los Angeles fuels segregation between the two
groups, and thus the formation of Barrios.
The author George
Sanchez focuses on the struggles faced by Mexican and Latino immigrants moving
into the metropolitan Los Angeles area. One of the well-known Mexican barrios
in Los Angeles is called Lincoln Heights.[2] Many Latino barrios at the
time were home to many poor immigrants who as a result of low paying jobs,
could not afford to live on their own. It was common in these barrios to have
multiple families living together in one house. Sanchez states that, “poor
housing options and unhealthy living conditions were much a part of Mexican
life in the city, as other unfavorable conditions”.[3] Lots of
the time, these substandard housing and overcrowded conditions, bred disease
and general poor health. Studies showed that, “although the Mexican immigrant
population was comprised of no more than 10% of the total population, they
constituted more than one fourth of the total number of patients diagnosed with
Tuberculosis”.[4] Other health hazards what came with these
poor living conditions included, “lead poisoning, rat bites, fires, and
respiratory disorders”.[5] Thus as one can see there were little to no
housing policy regulation at the time which lead to the spread of disease,
causing outbreaks in many of these barrios.
It was not
until 1944 that a real initiative was taken towards improving the housing
polices for immigrants. Senator
Dennis Chávez of New Mexico first introduced the Fair Employment Practices
Bill, “which prohibits discrimination because of race, creed or national
origin. The bill failed, but was an important predecessor for the 1964 Civil
Rights Act”.[6]
In 1949 the Housing act was initiated, in efforts to protect some of the
housing rights for immigrants. This act
addressed public housing and urban redevelopment, or urban renewal.
The way this Act was originally presented made it seem as if the government
wanted to better the Latino immigrant living conditions by getting rid of all
slums and replacing them with adequate homes.[7]
However, this Act worked as a way to begin gentrifying the Latino immigrants in
this particular part of Los Angeles. Another example of inequality and poor
housing policies for immigrants was confronting the California’s Ellis Act.
This act, “provided a mechanism whereby property owners can evict rent-controlled
tenants, demolish homes and rebuild the properties as upmarket homes”.[8]
This gentrification only increased the crowded housing situation, only making
matters worse for these Latino immigrants.
By the year
1960, Mexican Latinos had become the largest minority group in Los Angeles.
Although Latino immigrants still faced housing oppression and inequality, they
now had power in numbers, which sparked a turning point known as the Chicano
Movement. Moving into the 1970's, the growing complexity of the Chicano
movement was based primarily on the, “transformation of Mexican communities as
a result of large scale immigration from Mexico and Central America”.[9]
The Chicano movement not only embraced and incorporated Latino culture into Los
Angeles, but this movement also worked to eliminate Latino inequality and
better housing policies. During this time, many aspiring Latino students took
it upon their selves to get involved. In 1968, “over 30,000 students from five
local high schools in Los Angeles, walked out in protest of the conditions of
their campuses and the status of their education”, and this was just one of the
many ways in which Latinos worked to change equality status.[10]
Several other post war Mexican organizations arose such as, the “League of
United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) and the Mexican American Legal Defense
and Educational Fund (MALDEF)”.[11]
These organizations have proven themselves over the years, and now colleges all
over the country are mandated to offer cultural studies as part of the
curriculum.
From the
time Latino immigrants first started coming to Los Angeles in the 1930’s they
experienced exploitation in both housing and their jobs. These immigrants faced
the struggles that came with low wage paying jobs and high housing costs. Among
many issues, this forced many immigrant families into poor crowded living
conditions. However, as years passes and progress was made, the Chicano
movement eventually evolved. This movement lead to the liberation of Latino
immigrants as a whole, not just throughout Los Angeles.
Bibliography
Abramsky,
Sasha. "Los Angeles … and the State: Caught in Affordable Housing
Crisis." CityWatch Los Angeles. February 23, 2016. Accessed April 10, 2016
Bender,
Steven. Tierra Y Libertad: Land, Liberty, and Latino Housing. New York, NY: New
York University Press, 2010. (pg.5)
Benitez,
Thomas. "East L.A.: Past and Present." PBS. 2004. Accessed April 10,
2016. http://www.pbs.org/americanfamily/eastla.html.
"City
of Los Angeles Seal El Pueblo De Los Angeles Historical Monument City of Los
Angeles Flag." Mexicans : El Pueblo De Los Angeles : The City of Los
Angeles. 2016. Accessed April 10, 2016.
"Latino
Civil Rights Timeline, 1903 to 2006." Latino Civil Rights Timeline, 1903
to 2006. 2016. Accessed April 10, 2016. http://www.tolerance.org/latino-civil-rights-timeline.
"Mexican
- Moving to the Cities - Immigration...- Classroom Presentation | Teacher
Resources - Library of Congress." Mexican - Moving to the Cities -
Immigration...- Classroom Presentation | Teacher Resources - Library of
Congress. Accessed April 12, 2016. https://www.loc.gov.
Sanchez,
George J. Becoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture, and Identity in
Chicano Los Angeles, 1900-1945. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Von
Hoffman, Alexander. "A study in contradictions: The origins and legacy of
the Housing Act of 1949." Housing policy debate 11, no. 2
(2000): 299-326.
[1] "Mexican
- Moving to the Cities - Immigration...- Classroom Presentation | Teacher
Resources - Library of Congress." Mexican - Moving to the Cities -
Immigration...- Classroom Presentation | Teacher Resources - Library of
Congress. Accessed April 12, 2016. https://www.loc.gov.
[2] Sanchez,
George J. Becoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture, and Identity in
Chicano Los Angeles, 1900-1945. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
(pg. 63)
[3] Sanchez,
George J. Becoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture, and Identity in
Chicano Los Angeles, 1900-1945. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. (pg.
65)
[4] Sanchez,
George J. Becoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture, and Identity in
Chicano Los Angeles, 1900-1945. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
(pg. 82)
[5] Bender,
Steven. Tierra Y Libertad: Land, Liberty, and Latino Housing. New York, NY: New
York University Press, 2010. (pg.5)
[6] "Latino
Civil Rights Timeline, 1903 to 2006." Latino Civil Rights Timeline, 1903
to 2006. 2016. Accessed April 10, 2016. http://www.tolerance.org/latino-civil-rights-timeline.
[7] Von
Hoffman, Alexander. "A study in contradictions: The origins and legacy of
the Housing Act of 1949." Housing policy debate 11, no. 2
(2000): 299-326.
[8] Abramsky,
Sasha. "Los Angeles … and the State: Caught in Affordable Housing
Crisis." CityWatch Los Angeles. February 23, 2016. Accessed April 10, 2016
[9] "City
of Los Angeles Seal El Pueblo De Los Angeles Historical Monument City of Los
Angeles Flag." Mexicans : El Pueblo De Los Angeles : The City of Los
Angeles. 2016. Accessed April 10, 2016.
[10] Benitez,
Thomas. "East L.A.: Past and Present." PBS. 2004. Accessed April 10,
2016. http://www.pbs.org/americanfamily/eastla.html.
[11] "Mexican
- Moving to the Cities - Immigration...- Classroom Presentation | Teacher
Resources - Library of Congress." Mexican - Moving to the Cities -
Immigration...- Classroom Presentation | Teacher Resources - Library of
Congress. Accessed April 12, 2016. https://www.loc.gov.
Had the chicano movement not as been as successful, where do you think Mexican Americans would be today? Would they have the same freedoms? Do you ethnic studies be taught the same way in schools as they are today?Would they even exist without such movements as the chicano movement?
ReplyDeleteIt is clear that gentrification harms many lower income people of color adversely. I'm wondering how the conditions of Mexican Americans in LA in the 40's compare to those of Black Americans at the time in LA? How did the Chicano movements successes compare to the Black Panthers for their intended communities?
ReplyDelete- Scarlet Brown
Your post is interesting in how you discuss the discrimination Mexican-Americans in Los Angeles to now the evolving Mexican-Americans prospering, which I think is great. My question is, are there other factors, besides the Chicano movement that is helping to improve the lives of Mexican-Americans?
ReplyDelete