BY STUDENT
The creation of the modern day Chinatown can be connected to
how the white population saw the immigrants as foreigners and not a good as the
white population in San Francisco. They initiated forced segregation on many
Chinese and those who were not forced, flocked to Chinatown for safety and to
be around people like themselves. If the Chinese were not pushed so forcefully
to live together in such a small area, they would have never been as concentrated
and Chinatown may not exist as we know it today. So from at least some
perspectives, the segregation for the Chinese was a good thing, the Chinese
concentrated themselves and formed Chinatown. But was it really good? The
conditions in Chinatown were horrendous and many of the people lived in constant
fear and poverty, there are reasons people called it a slum. The white
population found Chinatown fascinating and they started giving the slumming
tours to tourists. Although the tours were negative, merchants and other
Chinese in Chinatown saw the tours as an opportunity for income. Chinese began
creating modern day Chinatown, and after many years and a fire where everything
had to be rebuilt, Chinatown turned it into the major tourist destination it is
today. As Chinatown’s popularity exploded stores, restaurants, and tours began
in the area and Chinatown became a must visit location in San Francisco. Local
businesses and tourism became a major part of life in Chinatown, but the
neighborhoods around Chinatown were still segregated, forcing Chinese to still
live in Chinatown (Brooks).
So I bring up my question again, would the emergence of
Chinatown have occurred if there was not so much segregation and discrimination
against the Chinese? Would the picture on the left have turned into the picture
on the right? Would people’s lives be different? If there was not segregation
and such a hate towards the Chinese, the group would not have been so concentrated.
Then the slumming tours would have never occurred and Chinese living in San
Francisco would have never felt the need to make a positive change for their
community and their population. It would not have become the iconic tourist
destination it is today and such an epicenter for Chinese culture. Of course,
Chinese culture was exaggerated and their oriental identify commodified for the
tourism industry, but without that Chinatown would not exist. It would probably
still be a slum. But it is not a slum anymore, the Chinese were segregated into
a small area and saw an opportunity for upward mobility. Over time Chinatown became
the iconic location in the second picture. The transformation would have never
have occurred if the Chinese did not experience discrimination and segregation
in San Francisco.
Brooks, Charlotte. "Chapter One Chinatown, San
Francisco: The First Segregated Neighborhood in
America." Alien Neighbors, Foreign Friends: Asian Americans, Housing,
and the Transformation of Urban
California. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1971. 12-38. Print.
In the Heart of Chinatown, San Francisco USA. 1902. California History Collection, San Francisco. California History Collection. Web. 28 Jan. 2016. <https://memory.loc.gov/ammem/cbhtml/cbrush.html>.
San Francisco. 2016. San Francisco How to Get Around, and What to Do! Web. 28 Jan. 2016. <http://www.leslieplustim.com/sanfrancisco/>.
So, if you could go back in time and change the way the white Americans treated the Chinese Americans, would you? Or do you feel that in the long run, even though they were treated very poorly, the Chinese Americans ended up benefiting?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI would agree that the at least partially enforced segregation and need to boost socioeconomic status through capitalist exchange with white folks were large factors in the creation of the booming, tourist evolution of Chinatown. Do you think there would still be a movement to commodify Chinese culture if the Chinese people in San Francisco were on the same socioeconomic level as white people?
ReplyDelete- Scarlet
I would agree with your questioning in would Chinatown even exist if it had not been for white population looking for tourism. I also like how you started your blog post by comparing a picture from the past and one from the present. While your blog post specifically pertains to Chinatown in San Francisco, do you think your opinion would be the same in Chinatown in New York City?
ReplyDeleteHi,
ReplyDeleteNice post! You bring up a lot of valid points and good questions that try to help make sense of what Chinatown is today. I agree that the forced segregation and the commodifying of Chinatown essentially formed what it is today and made the Chinese immigrants clean up their housing area, which was once known as "filthy." Although commodifying Chinatown basically exploited the Chinese and was a way for the white population to see how poor they were, many immigrant groups have been exploited in a similar way. Do you believe it is unfair to commodify or is it a way of becoming accepted into the American culture?
This was a really interesting post, and I thoroughly enjoyed the before and after pictures in the beginning. They added to your writing and gave a great introduction to what the blog would focus on. I agree that Chinatown would not be what it is today without the segregation and commodification of Chinese culture. But, were there any Chinese that completely rebelled against this transformation of their neighborhoods into tourist attractions, regardless of the economic advantages? If so, what did they do to stop this commercialization?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis is a great post and you bring up some really important points! I think that if the Chinese had an easier transition into San Francisco then the China town we know today would not exist. As a result of the great economic disparity at the time, slum tours were introduced to China towns which allowed for economic growth. Although in a way it is cruel that the only way the Chinese we able to escape extreme poverty, was to endure being treated like zoo animals, the slums tours helped tremendously. With some economic support, China town had been transformed into a vibrant, ethnic identity for major cities around the U.S.
ReplyDeleteHi, this is a really interesting post and I think that you made some great points. The commodification of Chinese culture is a delicate subject because most people never experience the impact of selling their own cultural identity. The events that you described in San Francisco helped to place the actions of Chinese immigrants in historical context, which is another thing vital to the understanding of California's cultural diversity. The way in which we discuss places like San Francisco's Chinatown are often dismissive, and your critique of the use of the term "slums" is a very important one.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading this post and your analysis of it. You brought up a lot of really good points, and it made me appreciate how those that were discriminated against turned it around and used it to their advantage. I think that the Chinatown that we know today would not have existed without that past, but was that past worth it? Although it is a major attraction now, was it worth what it took to get there?
ReplyDeleteI really liked how you thought through your hypothetical and actually looked at the whole situation as both a positive and negative for the Chinese living in Chinatown. It is very easy to see terms like 'slum' or 'segregation' and immediately look only at the bad things but - as you postulate in your post - there really are circumstances in which poor conditions and bad situations end up providing new opportunities.
ReplyDeleteI found this post to be interesting due to the fact that I've visited San Francisco's Chinatown, and I know a lot about it. Do you think the people living in Chinatown are acting the way they would like to, or do you think they are forced to exaggerate their culture for the entertainment of whites? What would make Chinatown an example of commodification? Do you think that Chinatown would lead to assimilation or more racism?
ReplyDelete