BY MR
After the class discussion of
the Albany SWAT team’s drill in the Ida J. Yarbrough homes last March, it
became clear that there is still a good deal of tension present between
ordinary citizens, specifically those living in the housing development when
the drill occurred, and the police. The idea that there is a strain on the
relationship between the police and the people that they are supposed to work
to protect was both shocking as well as maddening to me. Trust and discretion
are two of the most important factors that affect how law enforcement can
operate, without the trust of the public, no police force can be expected to do
the work that needs to be done to the best of their ability. The outcry from
the people of Albany after the incident at the Ida B. Yarbrough homes suggested
that they not only felt marginalized by the presence of the SWAT unit but
ultimately threatened by their decision to perform the drill so close to their
homes. The publishing of several scathing articles by the Times Union newspaper made the people’s displeasure with the police
quite clear, with the neighborhood being predominantly comprised of African
Americans, a lot of the discontent appeared to focus around the idea that it
was the intent of the police to make the population feel devalued and intimidate
them (Stanforth 2013). After reading The Condemnation of Blackness (2011) by
Khalil Gibran Muhammad and now being cognizant that at one point in time black
people were “written into crime,” it made me wonder if this structural
inequality still exists today.
The drill, as it was planned,
was supposed to be a SWAT practice raid of an abandoned apartment complex, located
near an apartment complex that was inhabited. During the drill, the Albany SWAT
unit was using fake bullets, fake blood, flash grenades and other technology to
simulate a real raid (Stanforth 2013). The anger expressed by the people
interviewed for the Times Union
article did not only appear to stem from the noise and confusion caused by the
drill, the demeanor of the police was described as impolite, insensitive and
overall showing very little regard for the people of the housing community. As
stated in Muhammad’s book (2011), black people were often made to feel degraded
and devalued by the police. Muhammad provides evidence of how law enforcement throughout
much of the early 20th century, continuously treated the black
population as second-class citizens (Muhammad 2011). Police mistreatment,
judges enforcing harsher sentences on whites than blacks, and an overall
miscarriage of justice imposed by the criminal justice system upon blacks
simply because of their race, illustrates that there has been a lot of
potential for African American backlash against the police. Perhaps the reason
people were so perturbed and bothered by the SWAT drill was because of what
Muhammad described happening to blacks decades ago. There is a feeling among
these people who were once marginalized but now have a voice that it is their
right and their duty to fight back against what they see as a miscarriage of
justice. The public outcry and protests that followed the SWAT drill are
indicative of the bad blood that still exists between law enforcement and racial
minorities. If Albany SWAT had perhaps conducted themselves in a manner more
conducive to getting along with the residents, maybe notifying them beforehand,
and not being quite as insensitive during the drill, there would not have been
as large of a public uproar. However, one is left to question why Albany Police
Department, chose this specific housing project in this specific neighborhood, and
these questions will always be hotly contested by community members looking to
take a stand against injustice?
Following the articles issued
in the Times Union, police chief
Steven Krokoff issued this statement: “In light of the ever-increasing threats to communities
across the nation, I have directed our department to provide the
most up-to-date training in a manner that is as realistic as possible. I
certainly did not mean to offend the very people that we are training to
protect. In retrospect, it was insensitive to conduct this type of training in
the vicinity of occupied residences. We will review how we conduct our
neighborhood-based training in the future and include the community in
evaluating its appropriateness” (ABC News 10). The desire to protect American
cities is no doubt a top priority for every police chief in the country during
this period in our nation’s history. The Boston Marathon bombings that took
place this April, just a short drive away from Albany, put the police
department and SWAT unit on high alert of home-grown terrorism. When it comes
to attacks pertaining to terrorism most people have a “not in my neighborhood”
attitude, so perhaps Albany PD was simply being hyper-vigilant in its
preparation. However, this fact alone still does not justify the choice of
location. Hopefully, Albany PD will be more careful about their site selection
and truly be aware of the neighborhood surroundings the next time they consider
performing a drill. In order to avoid perpetuating these racist policies, such as racial profiling and choosing to
perform drills in areas that are densely populated by African Americans, Albany
PD should make the decision to police with regard to “sympathy and faith in humanity”
rather than “scorn and contempt” such as Muhammad suggests in the last lines of
his book (Muhammad 2011). No one should ever be made to feel threatened or
diminished by the very force that upholds an oath to safeguard them. With open,
direct lines of communication, good community outreach, and a level of
compassion, it
is possible for the community and the law enforcement agency that protects them
to reduce tension on both sides and make their relationship stronger.
References:
ABC
News 10. Albany PD chief apologizes after training exercise upsets residents
Recorded March 24 2013.
Gibran
Muhammad, Khalil. The Condemnation of Blackness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 2011.
Stanforth,
Lauren. "Anger Over Unannounced Police Drill." The Times Union,
March 26, 2013.
The error of this incident definitely stems from poor planning and a lack of communication. As we discussed in class, if the Albany PD plans a SWAT practice raid in an area of a noticeably large black demographic, they should be prepared for this type of negative response through the connotations it implies. If they do, in fact, decide on a drill in such an area, they should take care to inform those around and explain the reasons for the necessity of the drill. Unfortunately, we do not yet live in a society where we can be completely color blind and mindless to our role in perpetuating the stigma of black criminality- we must be diligent in our thoughts and deeds, knowing that whatever actions we decide upon, they often inadvertently take a stance on the race issue. Given the monumental backlash the police received from this event, I am sure that they will not make this mistake in the future.
ReplyDeleteI agree 100% with everything you said in this post. Surely it was a result of poor choice of location and also lack of communication however it does make you wonder if it was also a result of tensions between minorities and law enforcement, if these tensions even still exist. After reading those articles and discussing it in class, it's definitely safe to say that these tensions do exist. The police department wouldn't ever imagine doing a drill like this in a white suburban neighborhood, and to us it just seems like common sense- but why? Whites seems to have more of a voice, and of course minorities do as well (as shown by the reaction of these people who were "victimized") but who's voice would be able to do more? In this day and age, a white person would be taken more seriously. The tensions still do exist unfortunately. Also, you mentioned that trust is one of the most important factors in law operation, so these people living in these neighborhoods should be able to trust their police department, the people that are supposed to be taking care of them. The police can't do their work the right way if people in society do not trust them, so although they are just practicing and doing their job, it should be done under more discretion and with more communication.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with what you said in this post. There was no reason for the Albany police department to perform this test in a residential area. Had it been in a white- majority area there probably would have been even more of an uproar but for some reason they decided to complete the test in downtown Albany, an area that is mostly African American. You would want the public to be able to completely trust the police instead of having them raid a vacant house right next to multiple houses that are occupied. They should perform this test in a completely unoccupied area instead of in an area where people are living currently. The police department should know not to perform a test raid in this area and hopefully it will not happen again in the future.
ReplyDeleteI was really intrigued by our class discussion on this topic. I was interested to find out that most students in the class did not see this issue as a racial or discriminatory one. It's really hard to form an opinion on this without being the actual people in the situation. Although I tend to agree that the action was not as deliberate as it may have seemed, I can also really understand how residents felt put down by the choice of police. Like I mentioned in class, I can't really imagine this happening in my neighborhood (being in a predominately white middle class neighborhood). Further, I can't imagine it happening without my consent or without at least the curtesy and politeness of the police who had to do their job. Maybe the issue is not just racial but also one of socioeconomic status. Is it ok to assume such a disaster would happen in a poorer area? Is it ok to invade resident's space because they do not pay as much for their property? What is the definition of property in this country if police are allowed to claim it and pretty much disrespect it for the day? Intriguing discussion.
ReplyDelete